![]() ![]() ResearchGate provides a free service that can be used by research or project groups however, its citation tracking is incomplete (it is limited to papers that have been uploaded to ResearchGate). Further, while they can track and amalgamate the publication metrics of individual faculty, they have more difficulty tracking research groups that are more ambiguous. However, they cost money to access and do not make their results publicly available. Digital solutions include institutional subscriptions to citation indices such as Scopus (Elsevier) and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics). While this results in a comprehensive database, it is resource intensive to pull publications from CVs into a central registry. For example, some academic departments have their researchers submit their curricula vitae (CVs) annually. As a result, several methods have been developed to track publication metrics. ![]() However, tracking these metrics is important to research groups who need to justify their use of resources, demonstrate the growth of their research programs over time, and promote the success of their research program. Authors may not submit their latest publications on a regular basis resulting in missing metrics. Faculty, post-doctoral students, and graduate students move between institutions, muddying amalgamated metrics. Productive groups have numerous authors who publish frequently. in an academic department, lab group, research collaborative, or institution) over time can be difficult. Tracking the publications of a group of scientists (e.g. Additional initiatives will be needed to standardize reporting guidelines within and between institutions. We anticipate that as this innovation becomes better known it will increasingly be adopted by traditional and non-traditional research groups to easily track their productivity and impact. In addition to having different organizational structures and purposes, the groups varied in size, consisting of 8–60 researchers, and prolificacy, with group citation counts between 1006–58,380 and group h‑indexes ranging from 19–101. Google Scholar tracked a diverse collection of five research groups over 6–36 months. We added the publications of each group member to their respective group Google Scholar profile and a junior faculty member monitored the citations that were suggested. We created Google Scholar profiles to track the scholarly productivity of five research groups: an institutional educational research program, a division of emergency medicine, a department of emergency medicine, a national educational scholarship working group, and an international organization dedicated to online education. Google Scholar automatically tracks the scholarly output and citation counts of individual researchers. A simple, scalable, and economical way to track publications from research groups and their metrics would address this challenge. However, it is difficult to accurately track the publications of research groups over time without significant effort. Show more Navigate Downīesides giving suggestions on how academic librarians can provide support to scholars, it includes the benefit of having librarians who are also scholars.It is often necessary to demonstrate the impact of a research program over time both within and beyond institutions. Making reference to already existing texts and answering questions that have been encountered by the author, the book is compiled to make easy, short, and concise reading that is an overview on the tracking of citations.īesides giving suggestions on how academic librarians can provide support to scholars, it includes the benefit of having librarians who are also scholars. That means there is a need to use valid and authentic platforms for publishing. ![]() In the wake of the competitive ranking of universities, there is an added requirement for faculty to be involved with research activities so they can enhance the standing of their parent institutions. This is even more critical in the fast changing environment, where even those who are established scholars find the new scholarly publishing paradigm hectic, and amateurs get easily intimidated. Citation Tracking in Academic Libraries: An Overview presents results from the overarching need for researchers to get relevant advice for their scholarly pursuits. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |